Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Deb Haaland

Dossier · Who's Who

Deb Haaland

Democratic nominee for Governor of New Mexico
verification: confirmed

The 2026 Democratic nominee for governor of New Mexico, who has proposed a first-day executive order pausing new large-scale data centers statewide while the Legislature writes rules.

At a glance

Current role
  • Democratic nominee for Governor of New Mexico2026–present[1]
Earlier roles
  • U.S. Secretary of the Interior
  • U.S. Representative
Category
Candidate
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
6 sources · 3 connections · 4 dated entries
Record id
PJP125

Key facts

  • 2026-09-17On September 17, 2026, said that if elected she would sign a first-day executive order pausing new large-scale data-center proposals statewide, would support a statutory moratorium and would not stop counties from adopting their own.[3]
  • Her eight proposed guardrails include no non-disclosure agreements, developer-built renewable generation, closed-loop cooling, hiring New Mexicans for union jobs, compliance with the state's clean-energy law and decommissioning bonds.[3]
  • The New Mexican reported at least $87,200 in data-center-related contributions to her campaign; asked about it, she said, “I believe that I can walk and chew gum at the same time.”[4]
  • 2026-08-24State filings show fifteen contributions of $1,000 or more from Oracle, STACK Infrastructure and the construction contractor Clayco and their executives, $112,200 in all, between August 24 and September 7, 2026.[6]
  • 2026-07-30Endorsed Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard, who twice denied the pipeline's state-land crossings, for lieutenant governor; Garcia Richard won the Democratic vote 53–46 on July 30, 2026.[2]

The record

The 2026 Democratic nominee for governor. On September 17 she said that if elected she would sign an executive order on her first day pausing new large-scale data center proposals statewide while the Legislature writes rules, would support a statutory moratorium, and would not stop counties from adopting their own.

Her eight proposed guardrails include no non-disclosure agreements, developers building their own renewable generation, closed-loop cooling, hiring New Mexicans for union jobs, compliance with the state's clean-energy law, and decommissioning bonds.

The New Mexican reported that her campaign received at least $87,200 in data-center-related contributions in the latest reporting period, including from Oracle and executives tied to Project Jupiter; asked about it, she said, "I believe that I can walk and chew gum at the same time."

The state's filings show more than was reported: fifteen contributions of $1,000 or more from Oracle, STACK Infrastructure and the construction contractor Clayco and their executives, $112,200 in all, between August 24 and September 7 — including $12,400 from Oracle America and $12,400 each from two Oracle executives listed in the filings as CEO (PJCL204).

Endorsed Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard, who twice refused the pipeline's state-land crossings, for lieutenant governor.

Relationships · 3

Linked (in tension with)

In the timeline · 4

Claims involving them · 2

What the project's companies gave, in the state's own filings (2025–26)primary-source
The project's executives gave the Democratic nominee $112,200; the Republican, nothingprimary-source

Sources · 6

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.