Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Gregg Hull

Dossier · Who's Who

Gregg Hull

Republican nominee for Governor of New Mexico
verification: confirmed

The 2026 Republican nominee for governor of New Mexico and former mayor of Rio Rancho, who opposes a statewide data-center moratorium and would write clawbacks into state incentive deals.

At a glance

Current role
  • Republican nominee for Governor of New Mexico2026–present[2]
Earlier role
  • Mayor of Rio Rancho
Category
Candidate
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
3 sources · 1 connections · 3 dated entries
Record id
PJP195

Key facts

  • 2026-09Opposes a statewide moratorium: “If you do a statewide moratorium then that sends the message that we're not even open for discussion.”[1]
  • Would evaluate projects one at a time, with guardrails and clawbacks written into state incentive deals.[1],[2]
  • On Project Jupiter: “Project Jupiter had guardrails built into it. Now, did they follow through on those? From what I'm hearing, no. So then you put clawbacks in the deal.”[1]
  • His campaign says he has not accepted or solicited donations from “big data.”[1]
  • State filings show no contribution to him from Oracle, BorderPlex, STACK, Bloom, Energy Transfer or OpenAI, and none of $1,000 or more from those companies' executives or the construction contractors.[3]

The record

The 2026 Republican nominee for governor and former mayor of Rio Rancho. He opposes a statewide moratorium — "If you do a statewide moratorium then that sends the message that we're not even open for discussion" — and would evaluate projects one at a time, with guardrails and clawbacks written into state incentive deals. On this project specifically: "Project Jupiter had guardrails built into it.

Now, did they follow through on those? From what I'm hearing, no. So then you put clawbacks in the deal." His campaign says he has not accepted or solicited donations from "big data."

The state's filings, searched by contributor, show no contribution to him from Oracle, BorderPlex, STACK, Bloom, Energy Transfer or OpenAI; and among all 317 contributions of $1,000 or more to his campaign, none comes from those companies' executives or from the construction contractors either (PJCL204).

Relationships · 1

In tension with

In the timeline · 3

Claims involving them · 2

What the project's companies gave, in the state's own filings (2025–26)primary-source
The project's executives gave the Democratic nominee $112,200; the Republican, nothingprimary-source

Sources · 3

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.