Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Safra Catz

Dossier · Who's Who

Safra Catz

Executive Vice Chair of the Board of Directors, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
verification: confirmed

Oracle's Executive Vice Chair and former CEO, named as a defendant in the bondholder suit over Oracle's AI-buildout debt.

At a glance

Current role
Earlier role
Category
Executive
Jurisdiction
Private sector (no public jurisdiction)
Married to
Gal Tirosh
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
4 sources · 1 connections · 0 dated entries
Record id
PJP29

Key facts

  • 2025-09Moved from CEO to Executive Vice Chair in September 2025, 13 days before the $18B bond close.[1]
  • Named among the defendants in the bondholder suit over Oracle's AI-buildout debt.[2],[3]
  • The bondholders' complaint alleges Catz is strictly liable under the Securities Act.[3]
  • Oracle CEO from 2014 to 2025, and sole CEO from 2019.[4]
  • A former DLJ banker.

The record

Oracle Exec Vice Chair since Sept 22 2025 (announced) (was sole CEO 2019-2025); ex-DLJ banker; former Disney board member (to Jul 2024). Named bondholder-suit defendant; transition landed 13 days before the $18B bond close

Relationships · 1

In the Watch · 1

eventOracle bondholder securities-fraud class action

Sources · 4

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.