Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Rich Guay

Dossier · Who's Who

Rich Guay

Registered lobbyist, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
verification: confirmed

The registered lobbyist for Oracle, the campus's anchor tenant, named in the September 2026 lobbyist list and in Oracle America's registry filing.

At a glance

Current role
Category
Lobbyist
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Also known as
Richard Guay
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
3 sources · 1 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJP192

Key facts

  • 2026-09-21Reported by The New Mexican as Oracle's lobbyist in the September 21, 2026 email to the Legislative Finance Committee.[1]
  • Oracle America, Inc. is registered as a 2026 lobbyist employer, and Richard Guay is registered and active for 2026.[2]
  • 2026-01-26Oracle America's roster lists Guay from January 26, 2026, and, from July 23, 2026, Kathryn Gunter and Merissa Khachigian.[3]

The record

Reported by The New Mexican as the lobbyist for Oracle, the campus's anchor tenant. Oracle America, Inc. is registered as a 2026 lobbyist employer, and Richard Guay is registered and active for 2026, in the Secretary of State's system.

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 1

Sep 21, 2026The lobbyists, by name

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Claims involving them · 1

Seven lobbyists, five registered employers: who is paid to advance the project in Santa Feprimary-source

Sources · 3

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.