Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Mariel Nanasi

Dossier · Who's Who

Mariel Nanasi

Executive director and counsel, New Energy Economy · Party representative, NMED air-permit hearing, AQB 26-57(P)
verification: confirmed

Executive director and counsel of New Energy Economy, the group whose motion asks NMED to throw out the air-permit application for want of a fuel supply.

At a glance

Current roles
  • Executive director and counsel, New Energy Economy
  • Party representative, NMED air-permit hearing, AQB 26-57(P)[1]
Category
Advocate or organizer
Jurisdiction
Private sector (no public jurisdiction)
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
1 sources · 1 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJP134

Key facts

  • Listed on the air-permit hearing's party list as New Energy Economy's representative.[1]
  • 2026-08-12On August 12, 2026, the hearing officer denied discovery and, the same day, denied New Energy Economy's motion for reconsideration.

The record

Leads the group whose motion asks NMED to throw out the permit application for want of a fuel supply.

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 1

Aug 12, 2026Discovery is denied — the hearing officer's third reversal

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.