Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / New Energy Economy

Dossier · Organization

New Energy Economy

Santa Fe energy-advocacy nonprofit (Mariel Nanasi, executive director; counsel Christopher Dodd); party to the air-permit hearing and movant on the motion to dismiss or continue the application for lack of a fuel supply.
verification: confirmed

A Santa Fe energy-advocacy nonprofit that is a party to the air-permit hearing and moved to dismiss or postpone the application for lack of a fuel supply.

At a glance

Kind
Nonprofit
Role in the project
Intervenor or party to a proceeding · Litigant
Based in
Santa Fe, NM
Public position
Publicly opposes the project — Moved to dismiss or postpone the air-permit application for lack of a lawful fuel supply.[1]
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
2 sources · 2 connections · 5 dated entries
Record id
PJO108

Key facts

  • 2026-08-05Moved to dismiss or continue the application because the campus has no lawful way to get its gas; an August 5, 2026 order directed the applicant to answer, and the hearing officer later withdrew that order as 'inadvisably filed.'[1]
  • 2026-08-12Its motion for reconsideration of the discovery denial was denied on August 12, 2026.
  • 2026-08-23In New Energy Economy v. NMED, the New Mexico Supreme Court stayed the entire proceeding on Air Quality Permit 10883 on August 23, 2026, while it considered the group's petition.
  • 2026-09The Attorney General filed a response supporting its petition in September 2026.
  • 2026-09-17On September 17, 2026, the Court denied the petition without explanation and lifted the stay; Mariel Nanasi said the group hoped for 'a fair hearing.'

The record

The group that turned the pipeline denials into a permit problem: its motion asks NMED to dismiss or postpone the application outright because the campus has no lawful way to get the gas it needs — and the hearing officer ordered the company to answer.

Relationships · 2

In the timeline · 5

Sources · 2

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.