Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Gabe Vasquez

Dossier · Who's Who

Gabe Vasquez

U.S. Representative, New Mexico's Second Congressional District
verification: confirmed

The U.S. representative for New Mexico's Second Congressional District, which contains the campus, who cosponsored two federal data-center bills on August 25, 2026.

At a glance

Current role
  • U.S. Representative, New Mexico's Second Congressional District[1]
Category
Elected official
Jurisdiction
Federal (U.S.)
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
1 sources · 0 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJP174

Key facts

  • 2026-08-25On August 25, 2026, cosponsored H.R. 9655, which would stop utilities recovering large data centers' grid costs from ordinary ratepayers, and H.R. 9825, which would compel disclosure of data-center water and energy use.[1]
  • Vasquez's statement: “New Mexico's water, air and resources belong to us, not to billionaires from coastal states who see an opportunity to extract profit from our land.”[1]
  • The only direct reference to Project Jupiter in that announcement was his July condemnation of a security guard's use of force at a county meeting.[1]

The record

United States Representative for New Mexico's Second Congressional District — the district containing the campus. On August 25, 2026 he cosponsored two federal data-center bills, H.R. 9655 and H.R. 9825. His statement: "New Mexico's water, air and resources belong to us, not to billionaires from coastal states who see an opportunity to extract profit from our land.

I've been appalled at the backroom deals, silencing of dissenting voices, shady NDAs and shell companies, and the overall lack of transparency." Worth noting precisely: the only direct reference to Project Jupiter in that announcement was his July condemnation of a security guard's use of force at a county meeting.

In the timeline · 1

Aug 25, 2026The district’s congressman cosponsors two federal bills

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.