Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Valerio Ferme

Dossier · Who's Who

Valerio Ferme

President, New Mexico State University (NMSU)
verification: confirmed

The president of New Mexico State University, which signed a desalination advisory agreement with BorderPlex the same day as the state memorandum of understanding.

At a glance

Current role
Category
Academic or researcher
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
0 sources · 1 connections · 0 dated entries
Record id
PJP15

Key facts

  • 2025-01-01The 32nd NMSU president, since January 1, 2025.
  • 2025-02-25Named in the governor's February 25, 2025 BorderPlex press release.
  • Comes from a comparative-literature background.
  • The record's assessment is that the NDA and records mechanism was likely executed at the vice-president-for-research level, not by Ferme personally.

The record

32nd NMSU President since Jan 1 2025; comparative-literature background (Brown/Berkeley) — the NDA/records-interception mechanism was almost certainly executed at the VP-Research level, not by him personally

Relationships · 1

In the Watch · 1

documentGovernor's Feb 25 2025 BorderPlex press release

Sources · pending

The sourcing pass for this entry is in progress. Nothing on this page is presented as beyond its verification tier until citations are attached.

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.