Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Teresa Leger Fernández

Dossier · Who's Who

Teresa Leger Fernández

U.S. Representative, New Mexico's 3rd Congressional District (D)
verification: primary-source

The U.S. representative for New Mexico's 3rd Congressional District, who on September 24, 2026 called for a pause on new data-center development in New Mexico.

At a glance

Current role
  • U.S. Representative, New Mexico's 3rd Congressional District (D)[1]
Category
Elected official
Jurisdiction
Federal (U.S.)
Verification
primary-source — Read off the primary document itself
In the record
2 sources · 1 connections · 3 dated entries
Record id
PJP196

Key facts

  • 2026-09-24On September 24, 2026, called for a moratorium on new data-center development in New Mexico until companies meet six “No Blank Checks for Data Centers” principles.[1],[2]
  • The principles: data centers pay for their own power and infrastructure, don't harm local water, meet the state's renewable and zero-carbon requirements, create union jobs, get community approval before permitting and building, and take no taxpayer subsidies.[1]
  • Leger Fernández: “The role of government is to protect us from greedy corporations … we will not give them a blank check.”[1]
  • The release does not name Project Jupiter or Oracle; it came the day Oracle's force majeure notice was reported.[1]
  • The second member of the state's House delegation to take a public position, after Rep. Melanie Stansbury's August letter.

The record

On September 24, 2026 she called for a moratorium on new data center development in New Mexico until companies meet six conditions she titled the "No Blank Checks for Data Centers" principles: don't raise electric bills — data centers pay for their own power and infrastructure; don't harm local water; use energy that meets New Mexico's renewable and zero-carbon requirements; create good-paying union jobs; get community approval and consult before permitting and building; and no taxpayer subsidies, with community benefits.

"The role of government is to protect us from greedy corporations … we will not give them a blank check." Her release does not name Project Jupiter or Oracle; it came the day the force majeure notice was reported. She is the second member of the state's House delegation to take a public position, after Rep. Melanie Stansbury's August letter.

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 3

Sep 16, 2026The House votes 417–3 to make big data centers pay their own grid costsSep 24, 2026Oracle sends a force majeure noticeSep 24, 2026A member of Congress calls for a pause

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 2

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.