Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Sen. Martin Heinrich

Dossier · Who's Who

Sen. Martin Heinrich

U.S. Senator for New Mexico · Ranking Member, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee · +1 more below
verification: confirmed

New Mexico's senior U.S. senator, ranking member of Senate Energy and Natural Resources and co-chair of the Senate AI Caucus, who has criticized AI data-center developers but has not named Project Jupiter.

At a glance

Current roles
  • U.S. Senator for New Mexico2013–present[3]
  • Ranking Member, Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee[3]
  • Co-chair, Senate AI Caucus[3]
Earlier roles
  • U.S. Representative (NM-1)
  • Albuquerque city councilor
Category
Elected official
Jurisdiction
Federal (U.S.)
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
4 sources · 1 connections · 0 dated entries
Record id
PJP116

Key facts

  • 2026-06-22In a June 22, 2026 interview, faulted AI data-center developers for “a healthy dose of arrogance” and late, thin community engagement.[1]
  • In the same interview, named emissions, water use and rising electricity prices as legitimate concerns, without naming Project Jupiter.[1]
  • The interview was timed to the SunZia transmission line going fully online.[1],[2]
  • No floor statement, press release or letter from the senator's office naming Project Jupiter is in the public record.
  • Donors include renewable developers, among them Pattern Energy, NextEra, LS Power and Xcel.

The record

Senior U.S. Senator for New Mexico (since 2013), engineer by training, former Albuquerque city councilor and NM-1 congressman. As ENR Ranking Member and co-chair of the Senate AI Caucus he holds the federal energy-and-AI portfolio most relevant to Project Jupiter.

In a June 22, 2026 Latitude Media interview timed to his SunZia transmission line going fully online, he faulted AI data-center developers for “a healthy dose of arrogance” and late, thin community engagement — naming emissions, water use, and rising electricity prices as legitimate concerns — but did not name Jupiter.

No floor statement, press release, or letter from his office naming Project Jupiter is in the public record. His donors include renewable developers (Pattern Energy, NextEra, LS Power, Xcel) that compete with gas-powered AI campuses for grid access.

Relationships · 1

Sources · 4

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.