Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Rep. Sarah Silva

Dossier · Who's Who

Rep. Sarah Silva

State Representative, House District 53, NM State Legislature · Member, House Appropriations & Finance Committee · +1 more below
verification: confirmed

Doña Ana County state representative who supports the project, negotiated its $50 million water and wastewater commitment for the Sunland Park area, and co-sponsors lobbying-disclosure bills.

At a glance

Current roles
  • State Representative, House District 53, NM State Legislature2025-01–present[1]
  • Member, House Appropriations & Finance Committee[1]
  • Member, House Taxation & Revenue Committee[1]
Category
Elected official
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Public position
Publicly supports the project — Co-authored an op-ed supporting Project Jupiter with water protections and oversight.[2],[3]
Married to
Heath Haussamen
Businesses
Coaching/consulting practice (occupation listed as "Coach/Consultant" on her official NM Legislature page; specific business names not verified this session)
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
5 sources · 2 connections · 2 dated entries
Record id
PJP42

Key facts

  • Negotiated the $50 million water and wastewater commitment for the Sunland Park area, including a $10 million metrics-driven community water-quality grant program in the Project Participation Agreement.
  • Co-authored an op-ed with Reps. Small and Ferrary supporting Project Jupiter with water protections and oversight.[2]
  • 2025-04-11Co-sponsor with Sen. Steinborn of lobbying-disclosure bills: HB 143, vetoed in April 2025, and HB 35 in 2026.
  • Running for re-election in 2026.[5]

The record

The Doña Ana representative who holds two threads at once: she negotiated the $50 million water/wastewater commitment for the Sunland Park area — including the $10M metrics-driven community water-quality grant program in the Project Participation Agreement — and she is Sen. Steinborn's multi-year co-sponsor on lobbying disclosure (HB 143, vetoed 2025; HB 35, 2026).

Supporting the project's benefits agreement and pushing to expose how bills get written are not the same position twice — they are the same legislator doing both.

Relationships · 2

In the timeline · 2

Apr 11, 2025The lobbying-disclosure bill is vetoedFeb 14, 2026The lobbying-disclosure bill fails on a 32–32 tie

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 5

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.