Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Rep. Mela Lara Cadena

Dossier · Who's Who

Rep. Mela Lara Cadena

State Representative, NM State Legislature
verification: caveated

State representative who said she and colleagues felt misled on HB 93 and who presented a data-center moratorium framework to an interim committee in August 2026.

At a glance

Current role
Category
Elected official
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
caveated — True with a stated limit on it
In the record
0 sources · 1 connections · 3 dated entries
Record id
PJP93

Key facts

  • Said she and colleagues felt "misled" on HB 93, as reported by a single outlet.
  • 2026-08-11With Reps. Chávez and Rubio, presented a data-center moratorium framework for 2027 to the interim committee at NM Tech in Socorro on August 10–11, 2026.
  • 2026-08-15Called the county jobs report signed by Oracle's tax director, posted August 15, 2026, "eight pages of propaganda."

The record

Said she and colleagues felt 'misled' on HB 93 (single-outlet)

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 3

Mar 20, 2025The amendment: Section 6 is added to HB 93; the Senate passes it 37–4Aug 10–11, 2026The interim committee hears the moratorium frameworkSep 21, 2026The lobbyists, by name

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Claims involving them · 1

Seven lobbyists, five registered employers: who is paid to advance the project in Santa Feprimary-source

Sources · pending

The sourcing pass for this entry is in progress. Nothing on this page is presented as beyond its verification tier until citations are attached.

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.