Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Raúl Torrez

Dossier · Who's Who

Raúl Torrez

Attorney General of New Mexico, NM Department of Justice
verification: confirmed

New Mexico's Attorney General, whose office opened a July 2026 investigation into fraudulent public comments on the air permit and in September 2026 supported both emergency petitions against two state agencies.

At a glance

Current role
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
2 sources · 1 connections · 2 dated entries
Record id
PJP129

Key facts

  • 2026-07In July 2026 the Attorney General's office opened an investigation into alleged fraudulent public comments on the Project Jupiter air permit.[1],[2]
  • Torrez: “If individuals or organizations attempted to manipulate the public comment process through fraudulent submissions, we will investigate those actions thoroughly and hold responsible parties accountable.”[1]
  • 2026-08-24On August 24, 2026, Rep. Melanie Stansbury wrote to the Attorney General, among other officials, asking for a public accounting of the project's water.
  • 2026-09-02On September 2, 2026, the Department of Justice filed responses supporting both emergency petitions, arguing NMED violated the air petitioner's due-process rights and that § 72-12-22 does not reach a change of purpose and place.

The record

The Attorney General whose office opened the fraud investigation: 'If individuals or organizations attempted to manipulate the public comment process through fraudulent submissions, we will investigate those actions thoroughly and hold responsible parties accountable.'

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 2

Aug 24, 2026A member of Congress asks the state to account for the waterSep 2, 2026The Attorney General takes the petitioners’ side against two state agencies

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 2

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.