Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Mark Vedral

Dossier · Who's Who

Mark Vedral

Senior Director – Land/Projects, Energy Transfer (Transwestern)
verification: confirmed

Energy Transfer's senior director for land and projects, who asked the State Land Office to reconsider its denial of the Green Chile pipeline's state-trust crossings and received the second denial.

At a glance

Current role
Category
Executive
Jurisdiction
Private sector (no public jurisdiction)
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
1 sources · 1 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJP127

Key facts

  • 2026-04-02Wrote the April 2, 2026 reconsideration letters on behalf of ET Gathering & Processing and Transwestern, two functionally identical requests.
  • 2026-07-14Named addressee of the Land Commissioner's July 14, 2026 letter denying reconsideration, the office's second denial.[1]

The record

Energy Transfer's land man on the Green Chile pipeline — he asked the State Land Office to reconsider its denial of the state-trust crossings, in two functionally identical letters, and received the Commissioner's second no.

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 1

Jul 14, 2026The State Land Office denies the pipeline a second time

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.