Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Madhavi Singh

Dossier · Who's Who

Madhavi Singh

Deputy Director, Yale Thurman Arnold Project
verification: confirmed

A Yale antitrust scholar whose paper argues the Stargate joint venture may violate the Sherman Act.

At a glance

Current role
  • Deputy Director, Yale Thurman Arnold Project
Category
Academic or researcher
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
0 sources · 0 connections · 0 dated entries
Record id
PJP9

Key facts

  • Authored a Stargate antitrust analysis under the Clayton and Sherman Acts for the Berkeley Technology Law Journal, volume 41.
  • The paper was supervised by Fiona Scott Morton.

The record

Deputy Director, Yale Thurman Arnold Project; Stargate antitrust paper (Clayton/Sherman Acts; Berkeley Tech L.J. v41), supervised by Fiona Scott Morton

Claims involving them · 1

Stargate JV may violate Sherman Act antitrustconfirmed

In the Watch · 1

documentYale (Singh) Stargate antitrust analysis

Sources · pending

The sourcing pass for this entry is in progress. Nothing on this page is presented as beyond its verification tier until citations are attached.

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.