Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Brian Yardman-Frank

Dossier · Who's Who

Brian Yardman-Frank

Assistant General Counsel, NM Environment Department (NMED)
verification: primary-source

NMED's assistant general counsel and counsel of record in the air-permit docket, who circulated the July 2, 2026 Notice of Docketing and followed up on the hearing officer's service contract.

At a glance

Current role
Category
Attorney
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
primary-source — Read off the primary document itself
In the record
1 sources · 1 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJP186

Key facts

  • Counsel of record in AQB 26-57 and co-author of the Department's July 2026 Position Statement.[1]
  • 2026-07-02On July 2, 2026, circulated the signed Notice of Docketing, explaining it served “to appoint the hearing officer and delegate decision authority to Deputy Secretary John Rhoderick.”[1]
  • 2026-07-09On July 9, 2026, wrote to the hearing officer, copying ERG's Susan Day, to check whether the new service contract was in place before setting the scheduling conference.[1]

The record

Assistant General Counsel, New Mexico Environment Department; counsel of record in AQB 26-57 and co-author of the Department's July 2026 Position Statement. On July 2, 2026 he circulated the signed Notice of Docketing, explaining that it served both "to appoint the hearing officer and delegate decision authority to Deputy Secretary John Rhoderick."

On July 9 he wrote to the hearing officer, copying ERG's Susan Day: "I just wanted to check to see if your new service contract is in place. If so, the Department is looking forward to setting up the scheduling conference."

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 1

Jul 7, 2026The appointed hearing officer says he cannot act until a contractor completes his contract

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.