Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Who's Who / Brent Moore

Dossier · Who's Who

Brent Moore

Registered lobbyist, Bloom Energy
verification: confirmed

A longtime Santa Fe lobbyist and attorney registered for Bloom Energy, the fuel-cell supplier whose installation is the subject of the air permit.

At a glance

Current role
Category
Lobbyist
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Also known as
J. Brent Moore
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
3 sources · 1 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJP194

Key facts

  • 2026-09-21Named with Scott Forrester as a lobbyist for Bloom Energy in the September 21, 2026 email to the Legislative Finance Committee, as reported by The New Mexican.[1]
  • J. Brent Moore is registered and active for 2026 in the Secretary of State's lobbyist system.[2]
  • 2026-07-14Bloom Energy's 2026 roster lists Moore from July 14, 2026, marked “Authorized: Yes,” alongside Scott Forrester, marked “Authorized: No.”[3]

The record

A longtime Santa Fe lobbyist and attorney, reported by The New Mexican as registered for Bloom Energy. J. Brent Moore is registered and active for 2026 in the Secretary of State's system.

Relationships · 1

Lobbyist for

In the timeline · 1

Sep 21, 2026The lobbyists, by name

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Claims involving them · 1

Seven lobbyists, five registered employers: who is paid to advance the project in Santa Feprimary-source

Sources · 3

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.