Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / Site Layer 1 LLC (Granite Renewables)

Dossier · Organization

Site Layer 1 LLC (Granite Renewables)

verification: confirmed

The developer of a gas-fired data center proposed near Hachita and Playas in Grant County, whose air application NMED says it will not act on until the company engages the community.

At a glance

Kind
Company
Jurisdiction
Private sector (no public jurisdiction)
Also known as
Granite Renewables
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
2 sources · 3 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJO146

Key facts

  • 2026-08-27Residents learned of the project from a legal notice in the Silver City Daily Press on August 27, 2026.[2]
  • The notice said the facility could burn about 2.3 million cubic feet of natural gas an hour and that an air permit application would be filed with NMED by October 1.[2]
  • 2026-09-18Environment Secretary James Kenney wrote to the developers on September 18, 2026 expressing 'disappointment' at their lack of community engagement.[1]
  • NMED's spokesperson said the department does not plan to act on the application until the company performs an acceptable level of community engagement.[1]
  • The company did not respond to reporters.[1]

The record

The developer of a gas-fired data center proposed for the rural south of Grant County near Hachita and Playas, which residents learned of from a legal notice in the Silver City Daily Press on August 27. The notice said the facility could burn about 2.3 million cubic feet of natural gas an hour and that an air permit application would be filed with NMED by October 1.

Environment Secretary James Kenney wrote to the developers on September 18 expressing "disappointment" at their lack of community engagement; the department's spokesperson said NMED "does not plan on acting on it until they perform an acceptable level of community engagement as outlined in the Secretary's letter." The company did not respond to reporters.

Relationships · 3

In the timeline · 1

Sep 24, 2026Two southern counties go opposite ways

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 2

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.