Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / NM State Ethics Commission

Dossier · Organization

NM State Ethics Commission

verification: confirmed

The state ethics agency that sued Elevate New Mexico over its undisclosed funders and announced Oracle's record lobbying-advertising disclosure.

At a glance

Kind
Government agency
Role in the project
Oversight
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Key people
Amelia Bierle
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
1 sources · 2 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJO68

Key facts

  • 2026-04-17Sued Elevate New Mexico on April 17, 2026, in case D-202-CV-2026-03769, over undisclosed funders of lobbying advertising.[1]
  • 2026-07-24Under its July 24, 2026 settlement, Elevate disclosed Yucca Growth Infrastructure, the permit applicant, as its sole funder.
  • 2026-09-16Announced on September 16, 2026 that Oracle had registered a $3,444,500 lobbying advertising campaign, the largest reported since 2021, the earliest year with records.

The record

Sued Elevate NM (D-202-CV-2026-03769, Apr 17 2026) over undisclosed lobbying-ad funders

Relationships · 2

Has as officer
In litigation against

In the timeline · 1

Apr 17, 2026The Ethics Commission sues Elevate New Mexico

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.