Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission

Dossier · Organization

New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission

verification: primary-source

The state body responsible for New Mexico's interstate water compacts, whose chair and director were addressed in Rep. Stansbury's August 2026 letter asking for an accounting of the project's water.

At a glance

Kind
Government agency
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
primary-source — Read off the primary document itself
In the record
1 sources · 2 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJO138

Key facts

  • Responsible for New Mexico's interstate water compacts, including the Rio Grande Compact and the obligations set by the 2026 consent decree.
  • 2026-08-24Rep. Melanie Stansbury's August 24, 2026 letter to chair Mark Sanchez and director Hannah Riseley-White, among others, asked for a 'clear public accounting' of the project's water sources, rights and permits by August 28.[1]
  • No response from the Commission has surfaced publicly.

The record

The state body responsible for New Mexico's interstate water compacts, including the Rio Grande Compact and the obligations set by the 2026 consent decree. Chair Mark Sanchez and Director Hannah Riseley-White were both addressed in Rep. Stansbury's August 2026 letter; no response from the Commission has surfaced publicly.

Relationships · 2

In the timeline · 1

Aug 24, 2026A member of Congress asks the state to account for the water

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.