Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / FERC

Dossier · Organization

FERC

verification: unverified

The federal commission reviewing the Green Chile pipeline that would carry gas to the campus.

At a glance

Kind
Government agency
Role in the project
Regulator
Jurisdiction
Federal (U.S.)
Verification
unverified
In the record
0 sources · 1 connections · 0 dated entries
Record id
PJO12

Key facts

  • 2026-01-29Energy Transfer filed the Green Chile pipeline with the commission on January 29, 2026, in docket CP26-80.
  • A FERC staff protest on the pipeline is dated April 13, 2026, and environmental groups filed protests on April 15, 2026.
  • 2026-09-10Its environmental assessment of the 17.77-mile line, published September 10, 2026, found no significant impact and opened comment through October 5.
  • 2026-08-14In August 2026 filings before the commission, Energy Transfer moved the pipeline's in-service date to February 2027.

The record

Reviewing the Green Chile pipeline (CP26-80); its staff filed a protest Apr 13 2026 — a protest, not a denial

Relationships · 1

Regulates or reviews

In the Watch · 4

eventWinter Storm Uri gas-electric cascade (Feb 2021)
eventGreen Chile pipeline filed at FERC (CP26-80, Jan 29 2026)
eventFERC staff protest on Green Chile pipeline (Apr 13 2026)
eventEnvironmental groups protest at FERC (Apr 15 2026)

Sources · pending

The sourcing pass for this entry is in progress. Nothing on this page is presented as beyond its verification tier until citations are attached.

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.