Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / Empowerment Congress

Dossier · Organization

Empowerment Congress

Community organization and original lead plaintiff in the first OMA lawsuit (D-307-CV-2025-02766) seeking to void the IRB and LEDA ordinances; withdrew November 6, 2025; Daisy Maldonado is its former director.
verification: confirmed

A community organization that was the original lead plaintiff in the Open Meetings Act suit seeking to void the county's IRB and LEDA ordinances.

At a glance

Kind
Community group or coalition
Role in the project
Litigant
Key people
Daisy Maldonado
Verification
confirmed — Two independent accounts agree
In the record
1 sources · 1 connections · 0 dated entries
Record id
PJO90

Key facts

  • 2025-10-17Named, with two residents, as a plaintiff when NMELC filed the first Open Meetings Act suit to void Ordinances 367 and 368 (Case D-307-CV-2025-02766).
  • 2025-11-06Withdrew as lead plaintiff on November 6, 2025; the individual plaintiffs continued.
  • 2026-02-06It is not a party to NMELC's second Open Meetings Act complaint, filed February 6, 2026, which NMELC brought in its own name (No. D-307-CV-2026-00398).[1]
  • 2025-10-29Daisy Maldonado, its former director, presented to the interim Water and Natural Resources Committee on October 29, 2025, describing the project as four data centers and a 700-megawatt gas plant.

The record

Original lead plaintiff in the NMELC IRB suit; withdrew Nov 6 2025 (individual plaintiffs continued)

Relationships · 1

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.