Skip to content
This site is continuously updated. Last updated:

Part of Project Jupiter Watch — the public record of the $165B data-center deal in Doña Ana County, NM. New here? Start with the Film →

The Web / Organizations / Affordable NM (political committee)

Dossier · Organization

Affordable NM (political committee)

verification: primary-source

A New Mexico political committee registered for 2026 whose largest contribution came from Energy Transfer, the company behind the Green Chile lateral.

At a glance

Kind
PAC or political committee
Jurisdiction
State of New Mexico
Verification
primary-source — Read off the primary document itself
In the record
1 sources · 1 connections · 1 dated entries
Record id
PJO147

Key facts

  • 2026-08-06Received $250,000 from Energy Transfer LP on August 6, 2026.[1]
  • Its other reported contributions are $25,000 from Presbyterian Insurance Company, $25,000 from In This Together PAC and $52 from the Democratic Governors Association.[1]
  • 2026-08-11Its only reported spending is polling: $17,500 to Northside Research and $9,800 to Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, both on August 11, 2026.[1]
  • The filings do not say what the committee is for, and the record does not guess.

The record

A New Mexico political committee registered for 2026. Its filings with the Secretary of State show four contributions: $250,000 from Energy Transfer LP on August 6, 2026; $25,000 from Presbyterian Insurance Company; $25,000 from In This Together PAC; and $52 from the Democratic Governors Association.

Its only reported spending is polling — $17,500 to Northside Research and $9,800 to Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, both August 11. Energy Transfer is the company behind the Green Chile lateral that would fuel Project Jupiter, and has large interests across the state's oil and gas economy; the filings do not say what the committee is for, and this record does not guess.

Relationships · 1

In the timeline · 1

Sep 14, 2026The first general-election reports show the project’s money

Dated entries in the record that involve this party. Appearing here is not an allegation — it means the graph draws an edge from this dossier to that event.

Claims involving them · 1

What the project's companies gave, in the state's own filings (2025–26)primary-source

Sources · 1

Contact us about this entry

Corrections, updates, and disputes are taken seriously and logged. If you are the subject of this page, this is your standing right of reply.

I am contacting…
Send via your mail app ↗

Opens your email client addressed to projectjupiterwatch@protonmail.com. Nothing is transmitted until you press send there. Responses from those named in the Watch are published verbatim.

The hearing has passed
The Watch stands.

The decision was due July 21. Instead: a public hearing — first set for October, then moved up to September 14 at the applicant’s request — and a ruling due by November 23. A $165B question for one desert county, on a schedule that keeps moving. The clock above always shows the next date that matters. Until the ruling, and after, this is the public watch on how it’s being made.